ka at pacific.net
Sat Mar 11 00:48:37 GMT 2006
Is this a dedicated MailScanner/SA box?
Have you consulted the MAQ about performance issues? You should be able
to run SA unless your hardware is obsolete or you've insufficient RAM.
We run 3 MailScanner/SA with lots of SARE rules, dccifd and rbl checks
in SA. The boxes are all dual 2+ ghz xeons with 1-2gb of ram.
One of them also runs DCCD (a real ram memory hog) and even it can push
through 150K messages a day if it has to.
Your MTA should give you some protection from "Massive SPAM attacks" as
Darth Sidious (it must be friday)
Anakin SkyWalker wrote:
> We have a busy mail server (150K msgs/day). Spamassassin is not a
> option for us even with newer versions because it slows down the scan
> processes in such a way that the incoming queue goes high quickly.
> We're using MailScanner for 2 years now and we're glad it exists. But
> sometimes even with no third part software for spam checks (SA), it
> slows down the machine and the queues go up again. Of course it only
> happens when we're getting massive spam attacks. We're looking for a
> solution and we do want to use SpamAssassin. Anyone with a similar
> problem to exchange tips, or even experienced users that know how to
> deal with such problems?
> Thank you.
> --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share
> photos without annoying attachments.
More information about the MailScanner