Don't understand this match

shuttlebox shuttlebox at
Thu Mar 2 08:35:11 GMT 2006

On 3/1/06, Richard Thomas <richard.thomas at> wrote:
> OK, I understand the reasoning behind that. The problem is then I guess
> that it obscures the reason the file was blocked in the first place. Not
> that I'm complaining :) Just wondering if there might be some way to
> reconcile the two issues. (For now, I may just make the reject reason
> more explicit).

I also got some questions from users regarding this so I just added
"(filename may be shortened)" or somthing similar to the reports.


More information about the MailScanner mailing list