O.T. milter-link - reject phishing & spam
Ken A
ka at pacific.net
Wed Jun 28 22:38:21 IST 2006
Steve Freegard wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> Ken A wrote:
>> Is the URIBL in your graph just a generic term here, or are you using
>> milter-link with URIBL rather than SURBL, or both? I was just testing
>> using SURBL, but might drop a couple more in and see how it goes...
>
> It's a generic term -- I use all three URI lists (in the following order):
>
> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
> multi.surbl.org
> black.uribl.com
>
> The spamhaus test is slightly different from the other two lists -- it
> lists the IP addresses of spamvertised web servers and seems to work the
> best of all three lists.
Seems like that could be risky when considering a shared hosting
environment, where there are hundreds of sites on a single IP. Wouldn't
you be punishing them all?
Thanks,
Ken A.
Pacific.Net
> Kind regards,
> Steve.
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list