O.T. milter-link - reject phishing & spam

Ken A ka at pacific.net
Wed Jun 28 22:38:21 IST 2006

Steve Freegard wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> Ken A wrote:
>> Is the URIBL in your graph just a generic term here, or are you using 
>> milter-link with URIBL rather than SURBL, or both? I was just testing 
>> using SURBL, but might drop a couple more in and see how it goes...
> It's a generic term -- I use all three URI lists (in the following order):
> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
> multi.surbl.org
> black.uribl.com
> The spamhaus test is slightly different from the other two lists -- it 
> lists the IP addresses of spamvertised web servers and seems to work the 
> best of all three lists.

Seems like that could be risky when considering a shared hosting 
environment, where there are hundreds of sites on a single IP. Wouldn't 
you be punishing them all?

Ken A.

> Kind regards,
> Steve.

More information about the MailScanner mailing list