Virtual mailuser with their own bayes db?

[Christian Pedaschus]

Christian Pedaschus wrote:

>Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Christian Pedaschus wrote on Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:58:43 +0200:
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I'll have a look at said solutions without bayes, because i don't like 
>>>the idea of having 1 big bayes db for users across different domains
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>FYI: unless *all* your users get a *lot* of mail you are better off with a 
>>site-wide db. If this is not the case the user's Bayes will be quite 
>>ineffective because it gets too few spam or ham.
>>
>>Kai
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>At least 200 spam/ham, i know, but that's no problem, most of the users
>have >2000 mails in their box (without all the spam).
>
>Messis everywhere (don't know howto translate messi, in german it means
>ppl who keep all kind of things, even if they won't ever need it again) ;)
>
>It's not so important to have a single bayes-db for every user, but at
>least a single bayes for every domain. The single user stuff was just my
>first thought because it seemed logical to use the users homedir for
>spamassassin.
>
>Btw. Jules, that would be my "call for improvements" :)
>
>Greets, Chris
>
>  
>
forgot to add that those 2000mails per box are from a few months, busy
mailers they are :)