MailScanner goes byebyes
Res
res at ausics.net
Mon Jun 5 09:00:32 IST 2006
Hi James,
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, James Gray wrote:
> Wow, 10 children - I hope you have at least 2 REAL CPU's/cores (not some wanky
yes, DL380 :)
> and a *LOT* of RAM (2GB territory on a dedicated server, double
Yep :)
> that if this box is sharing with other things). Are you sure you're not
> hitting some resource limit?
>
This only happens on one of the several mail servers, doesnt seem to be an
issue on any of the others and only some of the time.
> MailScanner needed more file handles than I was allowing it and resulted in
> the sort of "hang" you describe above when the mail queues got big. Once I
> upped the file handles limit everything was peachy again. There were plenty
> of messages in the logs (/var/log/messages and /var/log/kernel.log on Linux)
> which gave me the necessary clue.
Mine get none, the usual child starting blah blah, found and processed
X number of messages and thats it..
So I guess its a case of the childs starts, processes its first batch then
ninite we go :(
--
Cheers
Res
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list