Can the order of Spam, MCP, Arichiving processing be determined
x72m35 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 2 10:29:51 IST 2006
Thank you very much. You gave me an extremely good alternative work on.
Wonderful thing about MailScanner which I have noticed in documentation
and which I have not yet thoroughly used is using rules for most of the
configuration options. I think I should be using more rules.
-------- Original Message --------
From: Glenn Steen
Date: 02/06/2006 02:32 p
> On 02/06/06, Lasantha Marian <x72m35 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> The Problem (may be a feature request) is that the Archive feature of
>> >> the MailScanner processes messages before processing Spam and MCP.
>> >> results in having Spam and MCP positive messages being archived. The
>> >> need is to get the archiving messages which are Spam and MCP
>> >> only. Unfortunately for me I could not find a way to achieve this.
>> > The spam gets archived into a spam subdirectory of the day's
>> > quarantine. Just delete the archived spam directory every night.
>> I use "Archive Mail" option with rule set and forwarding to a selected
>> account. That is the reason why I am searching the capability to
>> control at which point the archiving should happen.
> If you want to have the cookie _and_ eat it.... Why not use what is
> already there? Just add the forward to your Non Spam Actions... Of
> course, these mails will not be in "untouched" condition, but that
> wouldn't be such a big deal. You could have that _and_ the archive
> mail->disk feature, and just keep the on-disk archive for a short-ish
More information about the MailScanner