Mailscanner mqueuein trouble
Denis.Beauchemin at USherbrooke.ca
Fri Jul 21 13:45:27 IST 2006
Res a écrit :
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Denis Beauchemin wrote:
>>> So in essence, S.A is good for stopping about 0.1% of it.
>>> nice and handy and warns the suer the otehr 99.9% of the time BUT
>>> because its a warning people will at least start to read it to see
>>> if its spam or genuine.
>> I disagree with you. SA, if you tune it right, will detect pretty
>> much ALL spam. But it needs lots of RAM.
>> We warn users above 5 and delete mails above 20 and yesterday we
>> managed to delete 59% of spam...
> Then its not catching the sort of crap we see, as per my previous most
> of it is low scoring so they see it anyway, if I was to run your
> settings here it would be a pure waste of time because you are still
> sending 99% of it to users to evaluate if itsspam or not, but each
> network to their own i supose.
> But I see in your followup post you only do about 100K a day, we have
> 3 machines that do 3/4 of a million+ and 1 that does well over a
> million a day (which is the problem one) each so they are not exactly
> little machines.
I can't imagine what it would be like if I had that many emails... but
I still think things like DCC/Razor/Pyzor might help you out.
°v° Denis Beauchemin, analyste
/(_)\ Université de Sherbrooke, S.T.I.
^ ^ T: 819.821.8000x2252 F: 819.821.8045
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3226 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20060721/b05b1a6b/smime.bin
More information about the MailScanner