Mailscanner mqueuein trouble

[Res]

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Denis Beauchemin wrote:

>> So in essence, S.A is good for stopping about 0.1% of it.
>> nice and handy and warns the suer the otehr 99.9% of the time BUT because 
>> its a warning  people will at least start to read it to see if its spam or 
>> genuine.

> I disagree with you.  SA, if you tune it right, will detect pretty much ALL 
> spam.  But it needs lots of RAM.
>
> We warn users above 5 and delete mails above 20 and yesterday we managed to 
> delete 59% of spam...
>

Then its not catching the sort of crap we see, as per my previous most of 
it is low scoring so they see it anyway, if I was to run your settings 
here it would be a pure waste of time because you are still sending 99% of 
it to users to evaluate if itsspam or not, but each network to their own i 
supose.

But I see in your followup post you only do about 100K a day, we have 3 
machines that do 3/4 of a million+  and 1 that does well over a million a 
day (which is the problem one) each so they are not exactly little 
machines.


-- 
Cheers
Res