Mailscanner mqueuein trouble
res at ausics.net
Fri Jul 21 02:21:06 IST 2006
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Denis Beauchemin wrote:
>> So in essence, S.A is good for stopping about 0.1% of it.
>> nice and handy and warns the suer the otehr 99.9% of the time BUT because
>> its a warning people will at least start to read it to see if its spam or
> I disagree with you. SA, if you tune it right, will detect pretty much ALL
> spam. But it needs lots of RAM.
> We warn users above 5 and delete mails above 20 and yesterday we managed to
> delete 59% of spam...
Then its not catching the sort of crap we see, as per my previous most of
it is low scoring so they see it anyway, if I was to run your settings
here it would be a pure waste of time because you are still sending 99% of
it to users to evaluate if itsspam or not, but each network to their own i
But I see in your followup post you only do about 100K a day, we have 3
machines that do 3/4 of a million+ and 1 that does well over a million a
day (which is the problem one) each so they are not exactly little
More information about the MailScanner