Another call for improvements

[Julian Field]

As I said earlier, use a ruleset with the Required SpamAssassin Score  
setting.

On Tue18 Jul 06, at 16:16, Ken A wrote:

>
>
> Dhawal Doshy wrote:
>> Ken A wrote:
>>> I know you just got back from vacation, so please take it easy  
>>> and file this somewhere deep in the pile.. :-)
>>>
>>> Per user S.A. scores would be nice. There are times when  
>>> whitelisting isn't enough, especially as mail from .CN continues  
>>> to be both very spammy and increasingly more necessary for  
>>> business. :-\
>> Ken, have a look at the 'SQLSpamSettings.pm' from the mailwatch  
>> project.. you do not have to use mailwatch to use this module  
>> unless you need a front-end to manage the scores.. even if you use  
>> the front-end you do not have to use the SQL Logging function from  
>> mailwatch, which tends to get resource hungry.
>
> This looks to be an SQL implementation of a .rules file, and very  
> handy for building front-ends to manage the HIGH/LOW spam  
> thresholds, but not really what I'm looking for. I want to be able  
> to set per user scores on every rule in SA, similar to what's  
> possible using SA alone.
>
> The Mail::SpamAssassin API allows an optional $userprefs_filename  
> parameter that contains the path to a per user S.A. prefs file, but  
> I'm not sure what would be involved in using this with MailScanner,  
> or if it's even possible with MailScanner.
>
> Thanks,
> Ken A.
> Pacific.Net
>
>
>> There is also a per-user / per-domain blacklist/whitelist module  
>> available if you require one.
>> - dhawal
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ken A.
>>> Pacific.Net
>>>
>>> Julian Field wrote:
>>>> Any of you got any features which you really need?
>>>> I don't guarantee to implement them, or even consider them :-)
>>>>
>>>> Anything you don't like, anything you particularly like  
>>>> (gratitude is always welcome :-) I'm a right sucker for it :-)
>>>>
>>>> At the moment there aren't any features people want, other than  
>>>> a 200% speed improvement which I've done my best for in the past.
>>>>
>>>> Don't ignore anything you have asked for in the past, consider  
>>>> them forgotten :-(
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jules.
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store !
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.