filename.rules.conf
Nerijus Baliunas
nerijus at USERS.SOURCEFORGE.NET
Thu Jan 12 00:47:51 GMT 2006
[ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:31:38 -0900 Kevin Miller <Kevin_Miller at CI.JUNEAU.AK.US> wrote:
> The wmf vulnerability is pretty new - week or so old I think. Not sure
> what you mean by uncomment, as it wasn't even in filename.rules.conf
> unless it's manually added.
In 4.49.7 it is commented out:
#deny \.wmf$ Windows Metafile security vulnerability
But I see in 4.50.6 it is uncommented already, so everything is OK now.
> users are very ignorant of computer security. They may or may not have
> up to date service packs or antivirus. Or antivirus and security
> updates at all. I'm not going to trust my network to the digilance of
> clueless home users. YMMV...
I meant not only updates and antivirus software on a client machine,
but antivirus on MailScanner box itself. It really shoud catch such old
vulnerabilities. But anyway, it doesn't matter, Julian already decided.
Regards,
Nerijus
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list