filename.rules.conf

Nerijus Baliunas nerijus at USERS.SOURCEFORGE.NET
Thu Jan 12 00:47:51 GMT 2006


    [ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:31:38 -0900 Kevin Miller <Kevin_Miller at CI.JUNEAU.AK.US> wrote:

> The wmf vulnerability is pretty new - week or so old I think.  Not sure
> what you mean by uncomment, as it wasn't even in filename.rules.conf
> unless it's manually added. 

In 4.49.7 it is commented out:
#deny   \.wmf$                  Windows Metafile security vulnerability
But I see in 4.50.6 it is uncommented already, so everything is OK now.

> users are very ignorant of computer security.  They may or may not have
> up to date service packs or antivirus.  Or antivirus and security
> updates at all.  I'm not going to trust my network to the digilance of
> clueless home users.  YMMV...

I meant not only updates and antivirus software on a client machine,
but antivirus on MailScanner box itself. It really shoud catch such old
vulnerabilities. But anyway, it doesn't matter, Julian already decided.

Regards,
Nerijus

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!



More information about the MailScanner mailing list