MailScanner ANNOUNCE: Stable 4.49 released -- faster!

[Rabellino Sergio]

    [ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

shuttlebox wrote:

> On 1/4/06, *Rabellino Sergio* <rabellino at di.unito.it 
> <mailto:rabellino at di.unito.it>> wrote:
>
>     We've sendmail 8.13.3, with mcafee/clamav/sa ona Solaris 9 /4-cpu/
>     Sun-Fire-V440.
>
>     I changed only the release of MS, without changing any configuration
>     parameter; the cpu load average
>     has changed from 2.5/3 to 1.2/1.6.
>
>     It seems to be really faster than previous MS.
>
>
> Have you looked at the delay times in the logs from Sendmail? Do you 
> see a similar decrease there?
>
> -- 

I've investigated in the syslog, but the delay is strictly connected to 
the batch delay, so I do not understand how I can see a real speed-up if 
most of the delay is directly accountable  to the batch waiting.
 (maybe i'm wrong)

-- 

Dott. Mag. Sergio Rabellino 

 Technical Staff
 Department of Computer Science
 University of Torino (Italy)

http://www.di.unito.it/~rabser
Tel. +39-0116706701
Fax. +39-011751603

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!