possible useful feature

[Alex Neuman van der Hans]

Use DNSBL's at the SA level, not at the MS level.

And if you use them at the MTA level, make sure the MTA skips DNSBLs for 
AUTH users.

Glenn Steen wrote:
> On 10/02/06, thebet at tin.it <thebet at tin.it> wrote:
>   
>> Hi.
>> Just thinking about a particular scenario. Imagine a ISP of course
>> with roaming users and implementing DNSBL with mailscanner.
>> And this
>> ISP usedrac for pop before smtp support.
>> But....sometimes these roaming
>> users are listed on some DNSBL (when some user1 at domain writes to
>> user2 at domain fo example).
>> Not good. So ISP have to create whitelist
>> based on source mail address. Not a great solution.
>> Would be nice to
>> avoid dnsbl checks if source IP are listed on drac db.
>> milter-greylist
>> too is implementing this function in their develop release.
>> Comments?
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>>
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>>
>>     
> Apart from that you all in Italy should be concentrating on what's
> going on in Torino....?
> Well, don't do BLs in MailScanner then...!
>
> --
> -- Glenn
> email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
> work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
>   

-- 

Alex Neuman van der Hans
N&K Technology Consultants
Tel. +507 214-9002 - http://nkpanama.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20060210/9e239efd/attachment.html