New speed benchmark -- just virus scanning

Julian Field MailScanner at
Sun Feb 5 21:22:58 GMT 2006

Richard Siddall wrote:
> Julian Field wrote:
>> I'm sorry but I have no intention of supporting qmail in MailScanner.
>> Nothing personal :-)
> Could I ask why?  (Several reasons spring to mind, such as:
> 1/ OpenProtect already does a good job.
> 2/ Julian likes qmail less than Postfix.
> 3/ Julian's overworked and doesn't want to take on another MTA
> 4/ There's no way of adding another MTA to Julian's test setup
> 5/ qmail's even less compatible with the dual-queue approach than Postfix.
> 6/ Julian relies on other people to handle extra MTA's and nobody
> volunteered to handle qmail.
> and so on.)
That just about covers the bases :-)

Julian Field
Buy the MailScanner book at
Professional Support Services at
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

More information about the MailScanner mailing list