New speed benchmark -- just virus scanning

[Julian Field]

Richard Siddall wrote:
> Julian Field wrote:
>   
>> I'm sorry but I have no intention of supporting qmail in MailScanner.
>> Nothing personal :-)
>>
>>     
>
> Could I ask why?  (Several reasons spring to mind, such as:
> 1/ OpenProtect already does a good job.
> 2/ Julian likes qmail less than Postfix.
> 3/ Julian's overworked and doesn't want to take on another MTA
> 4/ There's no way of adding another MTA to Julian's test setup
> 5/ qmail's even less compatible with the dual-queue approach than Postfix.
> 6/ Julian relies on other people to handle extra MTA's and nobody
> volunteered to handle qmail.
> and so on.)
>   
That just about covers the bases :-)

-- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.