New speed benchmark

Glenn Steen glenn.steen at
Sat Feb 4 14:01:14 GMT 2006

On 04/02/06, Julian Field <MailScanner at> wrote:
> It was just a copy of our incoming email feed for a while, so it was a
> totally normal spread of everything. No point testing things on fiddled
> or generated mail.
In that case I'd have to say it's a truly awe-inspiring benchmark.
It would be _very_ interresting to hear what a similar test with
Postfix, Exim and Zmailer (and Sendmail, of course) would give
(preferably on the same stream of messages... "replaying" or four
identical boxes...). I've nevere seen that type of statistic thats
been reliable, it'd be a treat!

BTW, Jules ... Could you, pretty please, look at my post about typos
in actions? Or has that area been covered extensively before?
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se

More information about the MailScanner mailing list