New speed benchmark

[Glenn Steen]

On 04/02/06, shuttlebox <shuttlebox at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/3/06, Res <res at ausics.net> wrote:
> > 10? I hope to hell its on a 15 yo 5400 rpm ide
> >
> > thats only 8 msgs a second, we easily do more than that on dual xeon 2
> > gig ram with qmail and qmailscan and the load avgs constant 2-2.5
> >
> > looks like i wont be trying to intergrate MS with our qmail servers,
> > prolly a good idea since nobody has clear intructions on how to
> > install with qmail anyway
> >
> > Still happy to use it on our sendmail boxes tho :)
> >
>
>  Is that with SA or just virus checking? I find that SA with all its network
> checks adds a lot more time than the virus scan.
>
Not to mention long IO waits that "synthetically" increase load (lots
of state D processes).

--
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se