Panda Wrapper reporting zero
Rick Cooper
rcooper at dwford.com
Fri Feb 3 11:46:13 GMT 2006
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info]On Behalf Of Victor
> DiMichina
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 2:21 PM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: Panda Wrapper reporting zero
>
>
>
> Julian Field wrote:
>
> > Very few people have ever had much luck getting Panda to work
> > properly. It is the worst of all the virus scanners I support. Check
> > you /etc/MailScanner/virus.scanners.conf file to be sure you have the
> > right path.
> >
> > Run this
> > /usr/lib/MailScanner/panda-wrapper /usr /tmp
> > will scan /tmp for you, the "/usr" argument is the path taken from the
> > end of the corresponding line in virus.scanners.conf.
> >
> I figured as much. I had it working when the wrapper was all in
> Spanish and before Panda went to their over-engineered output. :)
>
> Looking through the archives, it seems like some had a measure of
> success with Rick's new wrapper. I can actually see results of the
> wrapper detecting and eliminating virus files, but can't get an
> accurate report. The only reason I'm bothering is because I'm under
> support for one more year, and I'd like to use it.
>
When you say an accurate report, it's not logging the detections in the
maillog? I am still at 4.46.2 because there were so many changes after that
I haven't had the desire to rebuild the two patches I have to integrate into
each new MS release but I suppose I can try and get to it this weekend and
see if something might have changed to affect the logging. It seemed like I
had to do something to prevent double logging and perhaps that was fixed and
now it doesn't log anything?
Rick
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list