Beta to latest stable suggestions

[Julian Field]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I don't write MailWatch, I know nothing about MW changes.
If you want to see the difference in MailScanner versions 4.50.12 and  
4.50.15 then extract the ChangeLogs from them both and compare the  
files.

The only MailWatch-related change to MailScanner is the addition of  
one extra configuration option "Always Looked Up Last After Batch"  
which Steve isn't using yet, but will do in the future.

On 2 Feb 2006, at 14:44, Steve Campbell wrote:

> Mr. Field,
>
> If you have time, and can elaborate on what the MW changes from  
> 4.50-12 Beta to 4.50-15 might be, I would appreciate it. I was  
> having some problems with MW after upgrading, mostly with the  
> quarantine views, but was not able to track the problem down.
>
> I will upgrade this afternoon, and there is no urgency to this at  
> all. I have a work-around. The upgrade will tell me if it fixes the  
> problem. The Changelog lumps all of the changes for 4.50 into one  
> section, so I can't really tell the differences.
>
> Thanks for any reply and no big deal if you deem this a waste of time.
> Thanks for the superb efforts you always seem to provide!
>
> Steve Campbell
> campbell at cnpapers.com
> Charleston Newspapers
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian Field"  
> <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Beta to latest stable suggestions
>
>
>>
>>
>> Steve Campbell wrote:
>>> I had installed the 4.50-12 Beta last week to get the latest  
>>> configuration file changes. Is there any reason to upgrade to the  
>>> latest stable?
>> If you want to use MailWatch, then yes. There are a few other  
>> things too. It will be a painless upgrade.
>>> Should I have changed the "Minimum Supported Status" in the conf  
>>> file to 'Beta' for the Beta release, and what are the results of  
>>> not doing so if I should have changed this?
>> No, leave that set to Beta or Supported.
>> I'm going to remove that option altogether in the next release,  
>> it's worthless now.
>>
>> -- 
>> Julian Field
>> www.MailScanner.info
>> Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
>> Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
>> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>>
>> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> -- 
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>>
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!

- -- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.4 (Build 4042)

iQEVAwUBQ+Idkvw32o+k+q+hAQHyWQf/c/+W02pWhGiJQV+psiNXYOicLfeeR2xW
DD0iqwI6YCPsXWLOCQDssyXGvTQ/xaoBCS55mvoluYlU3sOk0mMJcUX0uikesSd6
y1etVkaORm50HlNP0zICNezJArdK2PLOkvO/CYgNT5OBJQKfhSprij0crYFoXyT2
evw2wTgoqohTBTxwrL5RslBnU4JfkJ3M51wbf2dPtgy3XTCzIbN2a4y8QUyK5YYd
7NqRZPJVbuHMSpR38+yNRG36ZALWogdvUF5CDjsph/En2MyB4E5pOQpJmS1ePgAm
lKdhIGehMqQk157eIAaLdSRLz7gZBKCJxPs3FfERXVOwzaGau3IHLQ==
=AJ+F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.