Is this really how bayes+autolearn works?
ssilva at sgvwater.com
Wed Dec 13 17:43:53 GMT 2006
Furnish, Trever G spake the following on 12/13/2006 7:14 AM:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
>> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf
>> Of Denis Beauchemin
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 9:59 AM
>> To: MailScanner discussion
>> Subject: Re: Is this really how bayes+autolearn works?
>> They scored 10 here:
>> SpamAssassin (not cached, score=10.448, requis 4.5,
>> BAYES_50 0.00,
>> INFO_TLD 1.27, SARE_LWHUGE 1.00, SARE_LWSHORTT 0.79,
>> SARE_MLB_Stock1 1.66, SARE_MLB_Stock2 1.66,
>> SARE_MLB_Stock6 1.66,
>> TVD_STOCK1 2.40)
>> The first one comes from base SA, all but the last one come
>> from 70_sare_stocks and the last one comes from 80_additional
>> in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org
>> (auto updated by SA).
> Thanks very much. I added 70_sare_stocks and got all the same hits,
> except of course the TVD_STOCK1 rule.
> I'm not presently using rules_du_jour or sa-update. Am I correct in
> guessing that your
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org directory is a
> sign that you're using sa-update, or is that generated from something
> I've been avoiding SARE, rules_du_jour, and sa-update on the theory that
> I don't have time to catch misbehaving auto-updated rules before they
> wreak havoc, and that there aren't as many eyes watching those rules to
> raise an alarm if a rule is bad. I guess it's time to reconsider that
> - Trever
There is a very good setup of rulesdujour with the patches to
bogus_virus_warnings that help with MailScanner false alarms at Fortress
And sa-update is as reliable as installing a new version of spamassassin, but
the rules get fixed or adjusted faster.
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
More information about the MailScanner