using Vispan with MailScanner
Richard D Alloway
ralloway at winbeam.com
Thu Dec 7 15:11:09 GMT 2006
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Thom Jones wrote:
> Just a quick question for anyone using Vispan -
> Which is preferable? Blocking at the sendmail access level or blocking with
> thanks for any input.
I've been using vispan for a few weeks now and have modified it to support
RBLs via rbldnsd (or compatible).
I like this approach since blocking via IPTables does tell legitimate email
senders (using a blocked server) simply fails without any information about who
to contact about removing the ban, etc.
The good points for using the IPTables method is that the connection is never
established to the MTA, reducing the overall load on your system, and you can
block regardless of the MTA used.
Another reason I like this method is that you can use the RBL to block at the
MTA level (any that support RBLs) or within MailScanner or within
SpamAssassin... there are many options! :)
I've attempted to contact the author of Vispan regarding my patches to 2.1.0,
but haven't heard back from the author or the Vispan site's webmaster (may be
the same person).
I'd be happy to share my patch(s) with you and/or the rest of the group if
you or anyone else is interested.
-Richard D Alloway
Chief Technical Officer
Winbeam Inc, A ClearWire Company
More information about the MailScanner