Thoughts on Barracudas?

[Julian Field]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Folks,

I have had some comments from a few people leaving the mailing list as 
they are ditching their MailScanner setups and switching to Barracuda 
applicances instead. They claim that things worked fine when they first 
installed MailScanner, but gradually more and more spam is leaking 
through, to the point where they have decided to abandon it.


Here is what he said:

"I've tried Mailscanner on FreeBSD for almost one year. It worked great
for about two months, then after every upgrade it began to let more and
more spam through. I've tried everything to fix it and just got tired of
my users complaining of increased spam.
"It wasn't worth the headache. Your forums indicate that there are
numerous people experienced the same problems I have encountered.
"I have since purchased a Barracuda SPAM 200 firewall. This device has
worked much better."



What is your opinion on the Barracuda appliance?
How easy is it to use?
Does it actually work?
Can it survive the loads they say it can?

And, of course, how does it compare with MailScanner?

Please be open and honest, and as impartial as you can.

All of your thoughts are most welcome.

- -- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.0 (Build 1112)
Comment: (pgp-secured)
Charset: ISO-8859-1

wj8DBQFE6axCEfZZRxQVtlQRAiZ7AJ4oePxv84AnY5kWulLNvXbHDhCNxACgnwq9
aSJKg2X8ibML6k+ZA3hpPlQ=
=Ji1K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk