weird spam, included in a word document

DAve dave.list at pixelhammer.com
Fri Aug 11 14:02:12 IST 2006


Anthony Peacock wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> DAve wrote:
>> Anthony Peacock wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>     I just received one funny spam.  The subject is : "Bill Summary 
>>>> - Invoice #26820".
>>>>
>>>> The body is "Invoice Code Change to Invoice Identifier"
>>>>
>>>> And there is a word document attached.  I scanned it with 
>>>> bitdefender, symantec, clamav, norman and AVG before opening it and 
>>>> it is... spam (software sellers).
>>>>
>>>>     Anyone getting these?
>>>>
>>>> Ugo
>>>>
>>>
>>> Getting loads, but they are all getting caught scoring about 10 SA 
>>> points.
>>>
>>
>> Can you post your test results? Our SA is missing them completely.
> 
> One recent one:
> 
> 3.50    BAYES_99    Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
> 2.17    DCC_CHECK    Listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)
> 1.00    RCVD_IN_JANET_DUL    Relay in JANET MAPS RBL+ DUL
> 1.46    RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB    SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server
> 3.90    RCVD_IN_XBL    Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
> 
> Another one:
> 
> 3.50    BAYES_99    Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
> 2.17    DCC_CHECK    Listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)
> 1.56    RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET    Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
> 1.00    RCVD_IN_JANET_DUL    Relay in JANET MAPS RBL+ DUL
> 1.95    RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL    NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
> 2.05    RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL    SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
> 1.46    RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB    SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server
> 3.90    RCVD_IN_XBL    Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
> 

Feeding Bayes this morning, can't use NJABL as we are an ISP, no SpamCop 
thanks, no DCC, XBL? well mine are certainly coming from different IP's 
than yours.

Thanks,

DAve

-- 
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?

Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.


More information about the MailScanner mailing list