[SOLVED] Retreiving attachments

[Scott Silva]

Stephen Swaney spake the following on 8/9/2006 12:05 PM:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
>> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Scott Silva
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 1:58 PM
>> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Retreiving attachments
>>
>> Golden, James spake the following on 8/8/2006 7:56 PM:
>>> Sorry for being so stupid.  After looking through it again, I see what
>> you were doing.  4 hours sleep a night catches up with you after awhile.
>>> Thanks for all the help.
>>>
>>> We will be implementing the Barracuda's appliances here in the next 5
>> weeks or so, that is why I am trying to "skate" by with this setup for
>> now.  I figure what I am learning here will still help out when we move to
>> those appliances.
>>> Although I have to say with the exception of the file attachment thing,
>> since I upgraded and setup everything correctly (I think) everyone has
>> been noticing the difference here!  In fact the guy who handles the
>> antivirus wasn't too happy with me, because now more viruses are being
>> caught as spam first.  Our virus numbers in email went from 200 - 300 a
>> day to 1 - 10!
>>> Thanks all (Julian?!) for this fantastic software combination!.  It
>> ROCKS!
>>> Thanks all who have helped with replies (especially Stephen), and have
>> put up with me!
>>> James Golden
>> Fortress's appliance will run circles around the barracuda's, and you
>> could
>> probably get 2 DefenderMX's for the cost of one Barracuda!
>>
> 
> {Start Commercial}
> 
> And you don't need a separate appliance for incoming and outgoing e-mail.
> That halves the cost again :) We now support DefenderMX Dual-core x86-64
> architectures so a fairly inexpensive system will process a HEAP of email.
> 
> We have beaten barracuda and the rest of the competition at some sites that
> have run fairly sophisticated comparisons before buying DefenderMX. More
> information and references available are available. Please email me
> off-list.
> 
> {End Commercial}
> 
> Thanks for your patience on off topic material,
> 
> Steve
> 
> Stephen Swaney
> Fort Systems Ltd.
> stephen.swaney at fsl.com
> www.fsl.com
> 
Hey Steve,
Everybody has to eat!
And your package is perfect for someone who needs a packaged solution. Many
new admins (or at least new to Linux) are being asked to get something
non-windows into production. Your package is great for that. I might even push
it to my PHB's in a year or so.

-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!