ClamAV on FreeBSD - ports or Perl module?
Adri Koppes
adrik at salesmanager.nl
Thu Aug 3 08:29:07 IST 2006
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf
> Of Koopmann, Jan-Peter
> Sent: donderdag 3 augustus 2006 8:10
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: RE: ClamAV on FreeBSD - ports or Perl module?
>
> On Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:06 PM Drew Marshall wrote:
>
> Drew, thanks for the wake-up call off-list. :-)
>
> >>> I would always say go with the ports.
>
> Yes. You should do that with every software available as a port.
>
> >>> They are up dated pretty
> >>> regularly so never far behind the source any way.
>
> Well in case of MailScanner: Mea culpa once again. I will try
> to produce an up-to-date version today.
>
> >> http://www.freshports.org/mail/p5-Mail-ClamAV/
> >>
> >> See entry on 23 Feb 2004
>
> So long ago. Let me search my memory. :-) At that time the
> module required threaded perl to work. I am not sure whether
> or not this was a perl or a clamav requirement. Recompiling
> perl with threaded support helped but personally gave me
> other problems so I always went for the command-line version.
> If others say it works with the non-threaded version now
> things might have changed. I will give it a try (maybe this
> afternoon). Are you "only" getting the warning in
> pkg-message? If so I would guess it is just an outdated warning.
Jan Peter,
I have been using p5-Mail-ClamAV 0.30 with the standard perl 5.8.6 on
FreeBSD 5.4 without any problems for over 1 year now.
Regards,
Adri.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list