greylisting?
Damian Mendoza
damian at workgroupsolutions.com
Sat Apr 15 06:49:08 IST 2006
It's the only way that I'm able to stop the 5% of spam that keeps
getting past RBLs, SURBLS, SpamAssassin, Stearns blacklist,
rules_du_jour, etc.
It will reduce the load on your server as I don't have to process a
message for Spam since greylisting runs at the sendmail level. I can
support 120,000 plus messages per day with a single P-4 processor and
1GB memory
Regards,
Damian
-----Original Message-----
From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Chris
Yuzik
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 7:42 PM
To: MailScanner discussion
Subject: greylisting?
Hi Everyone,
We're catching loads of spam, but would like to take it to the next
level. From a bit of reading I'm doing, this may be some implementation
of greylisting. That said, I'm new to the concept of greylisting but it
seems to make some sense. We're using Sendmail on our server; how easy
and effective is greylisting? Does it add extra load to the server or
anything?
Thanks,
Chris
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list