Email rejected, what reason to give client??

[Rob Morin]

OK, cool thanks for the info i appreciate it, and do not take 
offense.... i just do not have the time i would like to have to get to 
know MS and  SA... so i do things to help me out that might not be 
kosher, so to speak....

I will up it to 5 right away and get Mailwatch and see what i come up 
with....

Thanks...

Rob Morin
Dido InterNet Inc.
Montreal, Canada
Http://www.dido.ca
514-990-4444



Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Rob Morin wrote on Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:29:39 -0400:
>
>   
>> mail.log.0:Apr  4 09:43:32 stewy MailScanner[4249]: Message 
>> 1BB94C2C6.78A0C from 211.45.20.46 (hanzulux at unitel.co.kr) to 
>> thedomainname.com is spam, SpamAssassin (score=7.208, required 4, 
>> BAYES_80 2.00, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST 1.71, 
>> FROM_BLANK_NAME 1.53, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD 0.16, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, 
>> NO_REAL_NAME 0.96, SARE_FROM_NONAME 0.65) 
>>  
>> So ok, there the info, so do i look up each rule to see what it means? 
>> Is ther ean table or an easy way to let a client know why??
>>     
>
> First, your score is too low. It's mute to complain about non-spam getting 
> caught by deliberately lowered score. Set it back to 5. Yes, I see that it 
> scored above 5. Nevertheless, sorry, and please don't take it as an 
> offense; lowering score from default is very stupid, especially if mail 
> from clients goes over it. If you have a problem with too much spam 
> getting thru then get better rulesets from SARE. On the problem about 
> description etc. Use Mailwatch, that shows descriptions for all rules and 
> much more and your clients have plenty to play around and will be happy.
>
> Kai
>
>