Odd missing X-Spam-Status: Yes header

[Jim Davis]

On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Glenn Steen wrote:

> Why do you rely on procmail handling this?

Procmail handles all local delivery, and I'm moving from a standalone
spamd/spamc setup where users do something like

:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
spam

in their .procmailrc files.  By policy, the server just tags; what users
do with that info is up to them.

As far as I can tell, that shouldn't be spoofable by a spammer simply
tacking on a 'X-Spam-Status: No' flag.

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!