ending the spam.assassin.prefs.conf madness.

[Anthony Peacock]

Hi,

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:58, Anthony Peacock wrote:
> >
> > However, if people think that manageing two files with such subtle
> > differences would be over complicated for the 90% of users that want
> > a simple out-of-the-box install.
> 
> I think having 2 files would be more complicated than absolutely 
> necessary.

Fair enough.

> >   Then I would prefer a
> > site_rules_path/mailscanner.conf file with a soft link from the
> > spam.assassin.prefs file.
> 
> Should the real file be spam.assassin.prefs.conf or mailscanner.cf? I
> am in favour of the real file being spam.assassin.prefs.conf and  the
> link being mailscanner.cf. That keeps the RPM installer simpler too.