small spam score, but defined as spam

[Peter Bonivart]

    [ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Jason wrote:
> Sometimes I recieve emails marked to be spam without enough spam score. The
> follow header is from an email (actually a spam). MailScanner correctly
> defines it as spam, but the score is just -0.125. So does MailScanner does
> not only rely on spam score? What else then?
>
> X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, spamhaus-XBL, SpamAssassin (score=-0.125,
> required 5, ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, BAYES_50 0.00, HTML_30_40 0.02,
> HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, INVALID_DATE 0.24, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.18,
> MIME_QP_LONG_LINE 0.04, MSGID_OUTLOOK_INVALID 2.70)

Julian,

this question pops up every week. Could you please consider having RBL
checks within MS disabled as a default?

--
/Peter Bonivart

--Unix lovers do it in the Sun

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!