Outstanding feature/fix requests?

[Derek Winkler]

    [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Yes but using files and keeping the LHS associated with the RHS of the and.

-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
Behalf Of Julian Field
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 4:23 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: Outstanding feature/fix requests?


Direction: address-pattern and Direction: address-pattern result
So for example:

From: domain.com and to: customer.com store,deliver

This could be used in, for example, Non-Spam Actions, and would cause
non-spam mail going from domain.com to customer.com to be stored in the
quarantine as well as being delivered.

Derek Winkler wrote:

>What's the syntax for rules containing and statements?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
>Behalf Of Julian Field
>Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 4:05 PM
>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: Re: Outstanding feature/fix requests?
>
>
>If you have a lot of address patterns that produce the same result, you
>can rewrite the rule so that it contains a filename instead of the
>address pattern. The rule will be replicated for each of the address
>patterns in the named file.
>
>So instead of putting this in a ruleset:
>From: a at b.com yes
>From: *@c.com yes
>From: d@* yes
>From: 127.0.0.1 yes
>From: 152.78. yes
>From: 10.1. no
>From: default no
>
>You can use this:
>From: /etc/MailScanner.conf/spam.whitelist.addresses yes
>From: 10.1. no
>From: default no
>
>And then in /etc/MailScanner.conf/spam.whitelist.addresses you put this:
>a at b.com
>*@c.com
>d@*
>127.0.0.1
>152.78.
>
>And files like the one above can contain the names of files containing
>yet more addresses. You can nest them up to 4 layers deep (intentional
>arbitrary limit to stop you making loops by mistake).
>
>
>Derek Winkler wrote:
>
>
>
>>Include statements in rule/config files?
>>
>>No nesting necessary since it makes it messy.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
>>Behalf Of Julian Field
>>Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 11:42 AM
>>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>>Subject: Outstanding feature/fix requests?
>>
>>
>>Other than a minor cosmetic one I can't reproduce, I don't think I have
>>any outstanding requests for fixes.
>>
>>Does anyone know of any fixes or features they would like to see, that I
>>haven't yet done?
>>
>>--
>>Julian Field


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
proprietary to Algorithmics Incorporated and its affiliates
("Algorithmics").  If received in error, use is prohibited.  Please destroy,
and notify sender.  Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege.
Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or
virus-free.  Algorithmics does not accept liability for any errors or
omissions.  Any commitment intended to bind Algorithmics must be reduced to
writing and signed by an authorized signatory.

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!