Version Performance

[Leonardo Helman]

this is frustrating

DOESN'T MATTER THE HARDWARE.

I have made a SOFTWARE upgrade, WITHOUT any change
to the hardware or hardware parameters.

Only software.

MS4-37.1 -> MS 4.44.1 
SA3.02 -> SA3.04

And I MEASURED a drop in the performance something like
more or less  10% (email processed on a certain time)

So (I think) it's a simple cuestion about anyone
measuring performance before/after upgrading.  

Do any of you measure top quantity of mails per second processed?
Something like "Upgraded, didn't change the hardware and get x% more/less"

Saludos

--
Leonardo Helman
Pert Consultores
Argentina

On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 10:03:04PM +0200, Koen Teugels wrote:
> 
>    On what hardware are you running this??
>    Thanks
> 
>    Ugo Bellavance <ugob at CAMO-ROUTE.COM>
>    Sent by: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> 
>    27/07/2005 15:38
> 
>                              Please respond to
>            MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> 
>                                                                        To
> 
>    MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> 
>                                                                        cc
> 
>                                                                   Subject
> 
>    Re: Version Performance
> 
>    Leonardo Helman wrote:
>    > Hi I have been seen a small drop in performance
>    > between MS4-37.7/SA-3.02 to MS-4.44-1/SA-3.04
>    >
>    > Under very heavy load we had been procesing about  15500 mails
>    > per hour, but with the new setup that number gets only to 13400
>    >
>    > There where no changes at MTA, or the machine.
>    > I only change MS+SA+some perl modules
>    > Compress-Zlib, ExtUtils-MakeMaker File-Spec File-Temp IO-stringy
>    > MailTools MIME-Base64 Storable Time-HiRes
>    >
>    > All the surbls/rbls are the same.
>    >
>    > The other rules are all the same but the default ones.
>    >
>    > I'm triyng to see where the problem is. (modules? SA? MS?)
>    Please start here:
>    http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:test_troublesho
>    ot:performance
>    and here
>    http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=maq:index#optimization_tips
>    --
>    Ugo
>    -> Please don't send a copy of your reply by e-mail.  I read the list.
>    -> Please avoid top-posting, long signatures and HTML, and cut the
>    irrelevant parts in your replies.
>    ------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
>    To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
>    'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
>    Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
>    the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
>    Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>    ------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
>    To unsubscribe, email [1]jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
>    'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
>    Before posting, read the Wiki ([2]http://wiki.mailscanner.info/)
>    and the archives
>    ([3]http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
>    Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
> 
> References
> 
>    1. file://localhost/tmp/jiscmail@jiscmail.ac.uk
>    2. http://wiki.mailscanner.info/
>    3. http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!