Scores for the URIBL_AB within SpamAssassin

[Magda Hewryk]

http://www.surbl.org/lists.html#ab

Hi,
I just wonder why URIBL_AB is scored so low with BAYES?  Usually the last
row is higher then the second (network check).
Is this an error?
Anybody has something similar to the list below?  Should I re-write the
rules in the spam.assassin.prefs.conf file and change the score?
What is the best practice?

# URIDNSBL
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
score URIBL_AB_SURBL 0 2.007 0 0.417
score URIBL_OB_SURBL 0 1.996 0 3.213
score URIBL_PH_SURBL 0 0.839 0 2.000
score URIBL_SBL 0 0.629 0 0.996
score URIBL_SC_SURBL 0 3.897 0 4.263
score URIBL_WS_SURBL 0 0.539 0 1.462
endif # Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL

plus:
score URIBL_JP_SURBL    4.0

Thanks,

Magda

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!