MailScanner stoped working after PERL upgrade (I think so)

[Glenn Steen]

    [ The following text is in the "KOI8-R" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

On 05/12/05, Boris Jordanov / âÏÒÉÓ êÏÒÄÁÎÏ× <boris.jordanov at gmail.com> wrote:
> Julian Field wrote:
> > It didn't give you a line number did it?
> > And what does the end of the maillog look like when it's just bombed
> > out with this?
> >
> > And does this patch to Postfix.pm fix the problem?
>
> After the patch:
>
> /var/log/maillog
>
> Dec  5 16:58:52 im MailScanner[9011]: MailScanner E-Mail Virus Scanner
> version 4.48.4 starting...
> Dec  5 16:58:53 im MailScanner[9011]: Read 683 hostnames from the
> phishing whitelist
> Dec  5 16:58:53 im MailScanner[9011]: lock.pl sees Config  LockType =  flock
> Dec  5 16:58:53 im MailScanner[9011]: lock.pl sees have_module =  0
> Dec  5 16:58:53 im MailScanner[9011]: Using locktype = flock
>
> And nothing more, the second MailScanner process does not start
>
> [root at im MailScanner]# service MailScanner restart
> Shutting down MailScanner daemons:
>          MailScanner:                                      [FAILED]
>          incoming postfix:                                 [  OK  ]
>          outgoing postfix:                                 [  OK  ]
> Starting MailScanner daemons:
>          incoming postfix:                                 [  OK  ]
>          outgoing postfix:                                 [  OK  ]
>          MailScanner:       In Debugging mode, not forking...
>
> The same here. This time no error messages, but the mail is not
> checked/delivered.
>
> [root at im MailScanner]# ll /var/spool/postfix/hold/
> total 8
> -rwx------  1 postfix postfix 1130 Dec  5 16:54 09E3416FBD
> -rwx------  1 postfix postfix 2101 Dec  5 14:51 7392E16FD4
>

And if you send another mail through, that "gets stuck" in hold too?
If the content of the mails aren't sensitive, you'd best send one (or
both) to Jules for inspection... As stated in the comments to line
332, these are (for some reason) deduced as "not fully written (by
postfix)".

Did you only update perl, or did PF get updated too?

--
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se