filetype.rules precedence?

[Kevin Spicer]

On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 10:14, Paul Houselander wrote:
> It seems to pass this rule but gets denied by the
> filetype.rules i.e.
>
> deny executable No Executables No programs allowed
>
> Is this what I should expect?

That is exactly what you should expect.

I've patched my copy to use a special keyword in filename rules to
override filetype rules.  However this could be easily confusing, I'm
hoping Julian might adopt my feature suggestion to allow the
specification of attachment filenames in rules files, which would also
solve your problem.






BMRB International
http://www.bmrb.co.uk
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
_________________________________________________________________
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete this message immediately.  Disclosure, copying
or other action taken in respect of this email or in
reliance on it is prohibited.  BMRB International Limited
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or
content of any email which does not directly relate to our
business.

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).