spam getting through.
Scott Silva
ssilva at SGVWATER.COM
Wed Sep 15 19:22:47 IST 2004
<x-flowed>
Julian Field wrote:
> At 18:15 15/09/2004, you wrote:
>
>> I am also using it at entry with Sendmail. I have days where the spam is
>> over 90% and no complaints for over 9 months. My only thought was to
>> just use SBL to avoid some of the dynamic IP checks. But I am not sure I
>> want mail from anyone not relaying through their ISP or at least a host
>> with a MX record.
>
>
> Please don't start blocking mail coming from servers that aren't MX's. We,
> along with many other large sites, treat incoming and outgoing mail as
> different services and run them on different servers. Obviously my outgoing
> relays don't have MX records as they do not listen for mail from outside
> our site, that's the job of the incoming mail servers.
I didn't mean to block all non-MX mail relays. I am just a little
concerned about mail comming from machines that "have no business"
sending mail directly.
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
</x-flowed>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list