RHEL clones

[Michael Weiner]

On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 16:38 +0200, Koen Teugels wrote:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/69534/
> Does anyone have an idea which of these support mailscanner? And has a
> chance to survive into the future?
> Is for chosing a new free OS for making our mailscanner configurations.
> thanks Koen

since they are ALL based on a RedHat distribution, they all "support"
mailscanner provided the correct perl RPMS and environment is there to
begin with. As to which has a future? Thats a good question, that i
dont think has a real answer - this is all dependent on the support
from the various open source communities (akin to fedora legacy
project) and may be supported now but dropped in the future.
Personally i like white box, but have played with Tao and CentOS, as
its very close to what the RHEL distribution looks like.

HTH
Michael Weiner

All information contained in this email is confidential and may be used by the intended recipient only.

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

    [ Part 2, "This is a digitally signed message part"  ]
    [ Application/PGP-SIGNATURE  196bytes. ]
    [ Unable to print this part. ]