Need clarification on whitelist rules

Julian Field mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Oct 1 14:42:12 IST 2004


<x-flowed>
At 14:19 01/10/2004, you wrote:
>--On Friday, October 01, 2004 13:56 +0100 Julian Field
><mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK> wrote:
>
>>What form would people like it in? Added to the per-user white and black
>>list code?
>>It would have to be a simple "remove them from the message if it's in
>>their
>>blacklist or not in their whitelist".
>>
>>Can people see any problems with this? Something is nagging me that this
>>isn't the correct functionality, but I can't see what the right answer is
>>for definite.
>
>The only problem I can see with it right now is that there will have to be
>a rule this rule to check the To:, CC: and BCC: headers to ensure that it
>gets disposed of properly in the case that all possible local recipients
>are removed. I'm sure you've probably already thought of that, though. :-)

Yes I have :-) That's easy, I don't use the addresses in the headers
anyway, only the real addresses which are in the envelope.
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
</x-flowed>



More information about the MailScanner mailing list