dspam!

[Dhawal Doshy]

    [ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions wrote:
>>Having read this
>>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0402&L=mailsc
>>anner&D=0&I=-1&P=173426 and quoting 'Wietse Venema' "don't depend on
>>one solution for spam", I wouldn't mind MailScanner supporting both
>>SA as well as dspam.
>>
>
>
> Did you actually read what Julian said?
>

Yup I have, Julian's observations were pretty valid in Feb this year,
however it's november and dspam has matured over the months.. So rather
than being dependent only on SA, it would be a worthwhile idea to
evaluate how MS can use both (and let SA continue as the primary spam
engine).

If we can have multiple rbls and multiple anti-virus engines, why not
multiple anti-spam engines.. for that matter why just dspam there are a
lot other bayesian / non-bayesian engines out there.
http://www.paulgraham.com/filters.html

2 cents,
- dhawal

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).