Different rules based on Queue?

[John Rudd]

Stephen Swaney wrote:
>

>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On
> > Behalf Of John Rudd

> >
> > Our mail servers do some routing and some local delivery, plus the usual
> > set up for Mailscanner has scanning being done before list expansion.
> > The result is that it's hard (perhaps impossible) to do per-user
> > preferences for spam assassin and per-user bayes databases, because at
> > the point where MailScanner gets the message there might be mulitple
> > recipients (so only one of them will determine the results for all of
> > them), or it might be to someone off campus (who wont have any prefs at
> > all), or it might be to a list (again, no per-user prefs at all, but
> > then the list might contain local users).
>
> Using sendmail extended queue groups can split a message for multiple
> recipients up into individual messages, one for each recipient, before
> MailScanner picks up the message. See:
>     http://www.murty.net/qgrpx/
>
> I've put the instruction on how to do this in the FAQ (twice) but now I
> can't find the instructions.
>

Having sendmail do it doesn't really help me any, because I'm not
running sendmail on the machines in question.

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html