SpamAssassin installation could not be found

Michael St. Laurent mikes at HARTWELLCORP.COM
Thu May 20 17:37:11 IST 2004


Julian Field <mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK> wrote:
>> As for the suggestion to use source vs SRPMS, there's no difference
>> in using the two as to where spamassassin's binaries and modules get
>> installed.
>
> In which case you struck lucky. On most systems the RPMs put SA in the
> wrong place.

They work fine in Red Hat 9 as long as you rebuild them from the SRPM.

--
Michael St. Laurent
Hartwell Corporation

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html



More information about the MailScanner mailing list