SpamAssassin installation could not be found
Julian Field
mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Thu May 20 10:12:40 IST 2004
At 04:25 20/05/2004, you wrote:
>As for the suggestion to use source vs SRPMS, there's no difference
>in using the two as to where spamassassin's binaries and modules get
>installed.
In which case you struck lucky. On most systems the RPMs put SA in the
wrong place.
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send leave mailscanner to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/ and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list