Ruleset application precedence

[Julian Field]

At 19:00 17/05/2004, you wrote:

>Does this hold true if I have "From: user1 at domain.com yes" in my whitelist
>rules and "From: *@domain.com" in my blacklist rules?

Yes.

>   I seem to remember having an issue like this on my system in the past,
> though I don't have the logs to back it up.
>
> > The whitelist (Is Definitely Not Spam) wins.
> >
> > At 17:57 17/05/2004, you wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >I am using rulesets for both
> > >Is Definitely Not Spam = %rules-dir%/spam.whitelist.rules
> > >Spam Actions = %rules-dir%/spam.actions.rules
> > >
> > >Which takes precedent over the other?
> > >IE:
> > >A rule in spam.whitelist.rules:
> > >To:     user at domain.com yes
> > >
> > >Spam.actions.rules:
> > >To:     user at domain.com delete
> > >
> > >Who wins?
> > >Thanks.
> > >
>-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
>To leave, send leave mailscanner to
><mailto:jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk>jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
>Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
><http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/>http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/ and the
>archives at
><http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html