signed posts

[Alex Neuman]

We could both stop using Outlook or Exchange altogether, too... ;)

-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf
Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 6:39 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: signed posts


Hi Alex,

Would it be possible to turn it off?  Your's and another persons are the
one's that I can't see automatically.  Or can posts to the MailScanner list
be excluded from not being signed?  Seems futile to sign a post knowing that
it will be altered, thus thwarting the purpose of the signature...

...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller                Registered Linux User No: 307357
CBJ MIS Dept.               Network Systems Administrator, Mail
Administrator
155 South Seward Street     ph: (907) 586-0242
Juneau, Alaska 99801        fax: (907 586-4500


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alex Neuman [mailto:alex at nkpanama.com]
>Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 2:17 PM
>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: Re: signed posts
>
>
>It happens to all of us because the e-mail is being altered (i.e. a 
>footer is being added) within the message itself.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On 
>Behalf Of Kevin Miller
>Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 2:34 PM
>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: signed posts
>
>
>Lately I've been seeing several messages in the mailing list that 
>didn't display in Outlook 2000 w/o manual intervention.  The dialog box 
>said:
>
>"The digital signature on this message is invalid because the message 
>contents were altered after message was signed."
>
>I suspect that the message is being sent, then the mailing list is 
>adding a footer or some such.  Is anyone else having this trouble or
>is it just
>me? I see it associated with several different folks on this
>list although
>since the vast majority aren't signing their emails.  They seem to be
>coming from folks using "Thawte Personal Freemail Issuing CA".
>
>Any easy fixes on my end or does one just have to live w/this?  I'm 
>hitting an internal Exchange 5.5 box, with all mail going through 
>MailScanner email gateways.
>
>TIA...
>
>...Kevin
>--
>Kevin Miller                Registered Linux User No: 307357
>CBJ MIS Dept.               Network Systems Administrator, Mail
>Administrator
>155 South Seward Street     ph: (907) 586-0242
>Juneau, Alaska 99801        fax: (907 586-4500
>
>-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
>To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
>Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
>http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
>
>-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
>To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
>Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
>http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
>

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html