Slow mail processing
Dan Spray
danslists at conpoint.com
Wed Mar 31 18:06:29 IST 2004
I had wandered about that. I read in the archives...
"I am about to try switching ext3 to data journaling. Note that you can
also increase the performance quite a bit by putting the
MailScanner/incoming directory on a tmpfs filesystem. MailScanner does a
lot of file i/o to the MailScanner/incoming dir, and this hammers real
disks quite hard. I have personally seen 30% speed improvement by doing
this. It only takes a minute to change and is definitely worth a try. All
the data in the MailScanner/incoming directory is temporary anyway, so you
don't need to worry about losing anything on power-outs."
This seems like a viable option...problem is, how? Is there a how-to out
there or something to follow?
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf
Of Spicer, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:58 AM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: Slow mail processing
Dan Spray wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have MS setup on a dual xeon 2.6 with 2 gig of ram and nothing else
> on this server this is running RedHat 9. Mail comes in and out in a
> test environment very quickly. However, when I turn other domains
> over to it and it actually starts processing a lot of mail (100+ msg
> /min) the incoming queue starts backing up and before long there are
> thousands of messages in the queue. I really am only interest in
> running the virus checks (clamav) and local Spamassassin checks
> (bayes, evil_numbers, etc.) so that may be a problem too...I don't see
> how to limit the Spamassassin checks to local check only in the MS
> conf so that may be my problem. I have pasted a snippet from the
> log. Any help in getting this sped up would be greatly appreciated.
You can turn off the network tests by using the usual spamassasin
configuration directives in /etc/MailScanner/spamassassin.prefs.conf.
Have you established whether your system is I/O or CPU bound? There have
been plenty of performance tweaks suggested on list before, probably the
best bang-per-buck is to put the work directory in tmpfs - you also probably
want to drop the batch size to, say, 20 or so, play with the number of
children until you find a number that works well for you.
BMRB International
http://www.bmrb.co.uk
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
_________________________________________________________________
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete this message immediately. Disclosure, copying
or other action taken in respect of this email or in
reliance on it is prohibited. BMRB International Limited
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or
content of any email which does not directly relate to our
business.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list