Password protected Zip archives
Mike Brudenell
pmb1 at YORK.AC.UK
Mon Mar 22 17:09:02 GMT 2004
Greetings -
I'm not sure if my message of last Thursday went out to the list: I got an
unexpected duplicate of my posting and didn't hear/see any replies go by...
Having just upgraded to MailScanner 4.29-3 I've been trying to get my head
around how the various directives in MailScanner.conf interact with regard
to password-protected Zip archives. Although the comments in the file are
extensive I'm afraid I'm still confused...
We use
Silent Viruses = HTML-IFrame All-Viruses HTML-Codebase
and I understand from the comment that the "All-Viruses" keyword implicitly
includes the "Zip-Password" keyword.
The other relevant settings are as follows:
Still Deliver Silent Viruses = no
Non-Forging Viruses = Joke/ OF97/ WM97/ W97M/
Allow Password-Protected Archives = yes
>From the comments for "Silent Viruses" I understand that when a
password-protected Zip archive is sent:
Having "Zip-Password" (albeit implicitly as we are using "All-Viruses")
in the "Silent Viruses" directive means that:
* The sender is not notified (because the of the Silent Viruses
lists "Zip-Password" and Non-Forging Viruses does not);
* No attempt at disinfection is made, although the message is
'cleaned' by having its problematic attachments removed;
* The intended recipient will NOT receive the message (because
Still Deliver Silent Viruses is set to "no).
So where does "Allow Password-Protected Archives" fit into this?
Does having this set to "yes" allow such through, even with the
"All-Viruses" keyword lists in "Silent Viruses"?
I'm trying to set things up so that all *viruses* are treated as being
'silent' *BUT* that password-protected Zip archives *are* allowed through.
This combination seems to be precluded by having
Silent Viruses = All-Viruses
imply "Zip-Password" as well?
Help? Please? :-}
Finally one small comment about the comment for "Allow Password-Protected
Archives", which reads:
# Should archives which contain any password-protected files be allowed?
# Leaving this set to "no" is a good way of protecting against all the
# protected zip files used by viruses at the moment.
Does it really mean this? (ie, controlling whether ARCHIVES which CONTAIN
password-protected files are affected?) Or does it really mean that it
controls whether PASSWORD-PROTECTED ARCHIVES are affected?
Cheers,
Mike B-)
--
The Computing Service, University of York, Heslington, York Yo10 5DD, UK
Tel:+44-1904-433811 FAX:+44-1904-433740
* Unsolicited commercial e-mail is NOT welcome at this e-mail address. *
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list