Custom Scores

[Pete]

Ugo Bellavance wrote:

>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>De : Pete [mailto:pete at eatathome.com.au]
>>Envoyé : 3 mars, 2004 01:26
>>À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>>Objet : Custom Scores
>>
>>
>>Just installed DCC on one of my servers today and is working nicely -
>>made me think that, if some messages are listed with checks like DCC or
>>certain RBLs, then they must be alsmot %100 spam, or 
>>undesirable emails?
>>
>>Has anyone heard of DCC or the best RBLs listing legit senders or
>>emails? is it worth giving these a much higher score so these message
>>score as High Spam and are deleted on the spot?
>>
>>OR am i am missing the central reaosns why this likes DCC only 
>>score 1.81 ?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>If that can help you, I got many DCC_CHECK score with 1.81, but also one with 2.91, like the one below:
>
>
>        (required 6, autolearn=spam, DCC_CHECK 2.91, HTML_50_60 0.10,
>        HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN 0.10, HTML_FONT_BIG 0.27, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10,
>        MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY 2.23, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET 0.56,
>        MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.32, MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT 3.03,
>        PRIORITY_NO_NAME 1.21, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 1.10,
>        RAZOR2_CHECK 1.05, X_LIBRARY 1.58)
>
>Maybe it is a setting that is variable...maybe ask on the DCC list...
>
>hth
>
>Ugo
>
>
>
>  
>
Thanks, twas justa  thought about these types of checks in general - 
seems like a lot of work for 1.81 - but its most likely because i dont 
understand enough about whether some of the entries in these lists are 
sometimes legit?