What's in a name? - "spam" / "not spam" {Scanned}
Fred Broughton
phred at SVERICA.COM
Wed Jun 30 16:59:00 IST 2004
Why not just spam and ham :-)
Phred
| Greetings -
|
| Someone has just pointed out to me a slight problem with the text used
to
| identify spam and non-spam in the "X-Blah-MailScanner-SpamCheck:"
header
| when used with an IMAP server...
|
| For spam this heading looks something like this:
|
| X-Blah-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.8,
| required 8, BAYES_00 -4.90, BIZ_TLD 0.10)
|
| and for non-spam something like this:
|
| X-Blah-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=22.781,
| required 8, autolearn=spam, BAYES_99 5.40,
| DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 0.75, ... )
|
How about ": spam" (colon space spam)
and ": not spam"
| The problem arises when trying to use client-side filtering with an
IMAP
| mail program. Such can be set to query the IMAP server to check the
text
| of a particular message header. However the IMAP specification
stipulates
| that this match is as a case-insensitive substring.
|
| Thus setting up a search to check the "X-Blah-MailScanner-SpamCheck"
header
| for the word "spam" matches both spam and not-spam messages. (The
converse
| -- checking for non-spam messages by looking for "not spam" is fine.)
|
| I am pondering changing the wording of one or both of these two
strings in
| the languages.conf file. The aim is to use wording such that neither
is a
| case-insensitive substring of the other.
|
| But choosing words that satisfy this whilst still being clear to users
is
| proving trickier than I'd at first thought. Possibilities I've toyed
with
| so far are:
|
| spam not spam
| ---- --------
| *spam* not spam (wildcards + problems if *s
omitted)
| spammy not spam (too colloquial?)
| probable spam not spam (doesn't fit high-scoring spam
well)
| spam genuine (implies approval of leak-thru
spam)
| spam legitimate (ditto)
| spam pukka (do most staff/students know
pukka?)
|
| Bearing in mind this is a "difficult to change subsequently" setting
once
| people have started using it in their filters I was wondering if any
other
| sites had taken this step to address the problem?
|
| Cheers,
|
| Mike B-)
|
-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send leave mailscanner to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/ and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list