Bayes not auto-learning at expected threshold

[Mike Brudenell]

Greetings -

--On Tuesday, June 29, 2004 8:37 am -0400 "Desai, Jason" <jase at SENSIS.COM>
wrote:

> Quoting from man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf -
>
> ========
> Note that certain tests are ignored when determining
> whether a message should be trained upon:
>  - auto-whitelist (AWL)
>  - rules with tflags set to 'learn' (the Bayesian rules)
>  - rules with tflags set to 'userconf' (user white/black-listing rules,
> etc)
>
> Also note that auto-training occurs using scores from
> either scoreset 0 or 1, depending on what scoreset is
> used during message check.  It is likely that the mes-
> sage check and auto-train scores will be different.
> ========

Ah!  Many thanks, Jase!  No matter how much I read about MailScanner,
SpamAssassin, DCC, Razor 2 and Pyzor there always seems to be something
more/something I've forgotten.  :-}

Cheers,

Mike B-)

--
The Computing Service, University of York, Heslington, York Yo10 5DD, UK
Tel:+44-1904-433811  FAX:+44-1904-433740

* Unsolicited commercial e-mail is NOT welcome at this e-mail address. *

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html