Bayes still effective?

[Bernadette Welsh]

MessageI'm not using SpamAssassin's Bayes yet, but considering implementing
it.   As you all know, the problem is that most spam deliberately tries to
mess up the Bayes engine by including lists of words buried in the message.

This strikes me as a pretty effective way of circumventing bayes.  Is it
worth bothering with?

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html