Manually test RBL?
peter at UCGBOOK.COM
Sun Jan 25 16:45:20 GMT 2004
Max Kipness wrote:
> Concerning the good server, I get basically the same results that you
> had listed. However, with the server that is having problems I get the
> following for the spamcop test:
> [root at pavescan MailScanner]# dig 126.96.36.199.bl.spamcop.net. any
> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> 188.8.131.52.bl.spamcop.net. any
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 15561
> ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;184.108.40.206.bl.spamcop.net. IN ANY
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> bl.spamcop.net. 86400 IN SOA loopback. root.loopback.
> 1 3600 600 3600000 86400
> ;; Query time: 23 msec
> ;; SERVER: 10.254.71.10#53(10.254.71.10)
> ;; WHEN: Sun Jan 25 10:13:06 2004
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 105
> Any suggestions? Do you know why it is listing loopback.
Look at line 4 of the output, non-existent domain. When you do a lookup
from the good server, does it use the same server (3rd line from end)?
Compare /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/nsswitch.conf between the two. Also
compare a normal lookup (dig www.ibm.com for example) for establishing a
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 + GMP
More information about the MailScanner