4.26- beta upgrade (was RE: Another MailScanner User!)
neilrobst at ALM.ORG.UK
Tue Jan 20 08:55:33 GMT 2004
Yes... fingers crossed!
Any other issues known with the 4.26-4 beta currently? What's the
general feeling in the community of it's stability, etc?
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 22:07, Drew Marshall wrote:
> Just for my 2p, my server doesn't have a high load but I suffered
> duplicate mail. My old set up on Slackware didn't suffer, the new on
> Gentoo did :-( . I'm not quite sure why but it seemed that the Postfix
> queue runner and MailScanner got in each others way with the result that
> MS picked up incomplete messages.
> <fingers crossed> Any way that's all in the past now </fingers crossed>
> Neil Robst wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >Just applied the 4.26-4 beta of MailScanner to my mail server, though I've
> >been unable to replicate the problem with the duplicate mails either before
> >or after (as expected) the upgrade. Do you know any details about
> >that -whether it only manifested itself when there were lots of recepients
> >on the message or a high load on the server or what?
> >This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> >believed to be clean.
> In line with our policy, this message has
> been scanned for viruses and dangerous
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner